MADAME ROSALIE BACLER de la VAL: A Character Sketch

 

Since March is Women’s History Month, and March 8 was International (Working) Women’s Day, I developed a character sketch on Madame Rosalie Bacler, a French émigré who came to the United States during the French Revolution, and who was a “working” woman, a “noble” who planned a French refugee colony in the Massachusetts Territory of Maine. Whenever I “introduce” this historical female to people, they become fascinated. Madame is the main character in the historical romance novel that I am attempting to write.

Frederick S. Allis, Jr.* suggests that Madame played a minor chapter in the larger story of the French Revolutionary War emigration from France to the United States. I contend she plays a major role, if not in land speculation and emigration, in the fact that Madame, within two months of arriving in the United States, and minimal knowledge of the English language, was dealing in land speculation with two of the major American land speculators, Henry Knox and William Duer. In less than two years, she was negotiating with William Bingham and Alexander Baring. Although her dreams were not realized, it was not due to her ineptitude in business and skill, but due to the financial over-extension and financial irresponsibility of both Henry Knox and Henry Jackson.

     Madame Rosalie Bacler de la Val, a French émigré who came to the United States to escape the atrocities of the French revolution, was an independent land speculator/settler in what is known today as Hancock County, Maine. In the 1790s, this region was the Maine Territory of the State of Massachusetts, part of the Penobscot Land Tract purchased from the State of Massachusetts by land speculators Henry Knox and William Duer.
     Only about ten percent of the post-American Revolution land speculators worked independently, outside a company. None, as far as I have encountered, were women—much less foreign émigrés. This identifies Madame as a strong and unique woman.
     The novel I am working on is historic romance. Madame the heroine in the first half of my work, will be placed in and developed through the context of actual historic documents. It is my task to demonstrate that her identity is not an extension of the men in her life, but is a result of both her gifts and her flaws.
     The truth be known, Madame was not “into” romance, needing neither marriage nor a relationship with any man to determine her identity. Men were simply a means to an end. However, in her culture, in her times, they were also necessary evil if a strong women wanted to achieve her goals.
     Whether she was married in France or simply had a relationship with the man identified on documents as “her husband” is unclear. What is clear is that she had a relationship with Jean Antoine Gontran Marzel de Leval, one that provided her with a power of attorney which enabled her to purchase land in the United States and may have provided her with an ultimately worthless deed for twelve hundred acres of Scioto (Ohio) land.
     He was also likely the father of her daughter, Saraphine.
     In the United States, the persons Madame connected with were necessarily male, since that was the gender of the land speculators. Within three months of arriving in the country, she had developed a relationship with William Duer, Henry Knox and Henry Jackson, all major players in the Scioto Land grant fiasco and the Penobscot Tract purchase. She was also involved with the Netherlands ambassadors to the United States, father Herre Van Berckle and his son and Franco Van Berckle.
     That she had plans to enter land speculation prior to her leaving France is implied by her intelligence, business acumen, and the speed with which she entered the playing field. After inspecting the land with her partner, Jean Baptiste de la Roche , she completed a contract to purchase land they had viewed from atop Schoodic Mountain, laid out the plans for a colony where French émigrés find refuge, and successfully sought settlers. All her actions awaited her receipt of the deeds. These actions were outside the images and ideas of what women were expected to be in the 1790s.
     Throughout the material available on Madame, little reference is made of her maternal instincts. In fact, this lack was demonstrated by the few references to her daughter, and a statement in a letter sent to her by a potential hostess: The children shall not disturb you.” Nor is there reference to relationships with other women. When she visited with xxx at Hull’s Cove, the feature of the visit was not that of woman to woman, but of French person to French person.
     Her relationship with men was founded on business, and her willingness to submit to them to get what she wanted. Was the statement “she was the mistress of Colonne and many other men” a sign of the lengths she would go with this submission?
     The business outfit seemed to fit Madame well. Perhaps she was viewed by society as individual and eccentric, but her strong goals were met with self-direction and tunnel vision. She was gifted in her ability to cut to the chase and get to the business at hand, in spite of having a language barrier.
     On the surface, Madame presented a persona with high self-image, worthy of the best in life, needing to be in control of her destiny. In reality, her drive compensated for a lack of self-esteem and the uncertainty, hyper-intensity of normal emotions, and deep depression typical of refugees in a strange country. Madame, attempting to control and sublimate these reactions, threw herself whole-heartedly into her land-settlement project.
     Her interpersonal relationships were mainly business-related, and the higher-echelon persons she interacted with, recognizing that her settlement interests were necessary to increase the value of their surrounding land, spoke of her with admiration. But it was her business efforts that they admired. Madame was unable to relate on a more personal level. Except for the occasion when she received a letter from France informing her that her sister and several friends had fallen victim to the guillotine, the only emotion she allowed to get out of hand was her volatile temper.
     Madame’s project turned sour William Duer went bankrupt and Henry Knox continued his poor financial management. Up to this time, the land speculators admired Madame. However, these two events
     The bankruptcy brought Madame’s work to a halt, since it undercut the Knox and Duer’s ability to pay the State of Massachusetts for the Penobscot Land Tract, a necessary action for them to receive the land deeds. Without the deeds, Madame could not complete the sales to her settlers, nor could she develop her colony.
     Madame was a risk-taker. Her contract to purchase the land was based on her selling small parcels to settlers. She depended on these sales to pay Duer and Knox. No sales, no deeds, no colony.
     She had invested $16,000, found settlers, and fulfilled all the necessary business demands, yet her project was doomed to fail. She was at the bottom of what could be viewed as a pyramid scheme, and she was the biggest loser. Her land was ultimately sacrificed, and her French colony never developed.
     Madame married Franco Van Berckle, a weak man, at a time when she recognized she could not keep up the fight alone. Quite possibly this was more of a business arrangement than a romantic relationship. However, her husband was unable to financially rescue Madame. In fact, his personality was so disagreeable that Madame’s biggest business supporters, de la Roche and Benjamin Walker, did all they could to separate themselves from Madame.

     Ultimately Madame appeared to have achieved her underlying goals—wealth and power. Madame spent the latter part of her life in British Guiana, living the high life, wife of a governor and owner/part owner of several plantations. She died a highly respected member of that country.
     Madame moved from her desire to accomplish her goals in her own right, to accomplishing them in the typical manner—through marriage and male connections. However, her actions, worked through her gifts and flaws, qualify her for being a role model to women throughout the ages. Had she been born in the early 21st century, she would be a woman who could break through the proverbial “glass ceiling.”

*William Bingham’s Main Lands 1790-1820; Publications of the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, Volume XXXVI, edited by Frederick S. Allis, Jr. Boston, 1954

~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

ADDITIONAL READING:

YOU MEAN THIS NEW ENGLANDER IS A WESTSYLVANIAN?

PENNSYLVANIA WEDDING, (LAMOINE) MAINE ROOTS

Advertisements

5 responses to “MADAME ROSALIE BACLER de la VAL: A Character Sketch

  1. I am working on a blog entry about Madame la Val and am trying to establish her part in the early days of Lamoine (I live here). I have found “Leval” road close to the town waterfront park and I am wondering if you know the exact location of her house. When did she build it? Anything left? What about her relationship with Marie Therese De La Mothe De Gregoire?

  2. From Mary: comment appeared on another post…

    Carolyn, your story of Madame Rosalie Bacler de la Val and her intertwined life and loves in the relatively newly created country of America is very interesting. I was reading your character description of her and was curious to follow some of your links. I was struck by a traditional description of her,written in a Lamoine, Maine periodical, that she was known to “tramp about her extensive property and mansion, attired in men’s garb, personlly supervising ongoing construction.” Knowing she had escaped the horrors of the
    French Revolution, inferring that she may have been very aware of the pre-revolutionary affectations of the noble and wealthy classes who adopted a “back to nature” philosophy espoused by Rousseau and taken to absurd lengths by the queen of France, Marie Antoinette. Madame de la Val may have had no difficulty at all, taking a hands on attitude with her workman in comfortable, working attire. As you have inferred, she was quite a woman in her time. In 1790 I don’t many think many women would have found themselves in her position, let alone rolling up her shirtsleeves, and tramping through the countryside and woods to get the job done.

  3. schoolspeechpathology

    I like reading about the character background. It would be good to know what social group she came from, since the revolution had so many splinter groups. For example, tradespeople in Paris were brutal using their tools to attack the rich. But there were also 200 tradesmen from Marseilles who marched to Paris and were different. There was so much backstabbing you hardly had time to form strong group ties. There were plots all over Paris, especially on the left bank where people like Danton and Herbert met.

    Women were torn too, as not all marched on the king while others took up axes and such and chopped up people, and carried their heads on a pike in public display. A woman in these times could not have settled emotions. Period. It was every man or woman for himself and a few others. The main character seems to end up with Victorian emotions, leading to “strength” and “determination” to succeed through business. This is so sharp edged. Better to make her a shrewd woman gaining power to keep from having to return to France, living intelligently by her wits. Again relationships with men seem sharp edged. French women have always been discrete so there would be no record of her sleeping habits.

    The character reminds me a lot of Coco Chanel, a poor girl who used her wits and her body to create a fashion empire. In her biography she admitted getting start up money from rich admires she slept with for that purpose. Without the biography she might appear to be much less inclined toward men.

    I think there is a tendency her to put some moral definition into the motivational foundations of the main character. I would prefer the reader be forced to make the moral judgments and the motivation judgments.

    These are just some passing thoughts. Your piece sparked my interest. JMP

    • John, I didn’t lose your valuable comments. I was looking for them in the e-mails. I haven’t come to this site very often—my planned 2010 path was diverted by life happening—Thank you very much for the insightful comments. You know so much more than I! I hope we can get together sometime and discuss the situation—in 2012!
      Carolyn

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s